1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info
Robert Longley

Robert's US Government Info Blog

By Robert Longley, About.com Guide to US Government Info

Conviction of "Ganja Guru" Overturned

Wednesday April 26, 2006
Speaking of medicinal marijuana, the 2003 conviction of so-called "ganja guru" Ed Rosenthal has been overturned by a San Francisco federal court. The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that a juror in Rosenthal's trial had sought the advice of a lawyer prior to deliberating on a verdict.

The appeals court further took issue with the manner in which the lower court had turned down Rosenthal's request for a new trial. "We find that the district court applied an overly burdensome standard of proof and that, under the appropriate standard of review, prejudice is evident," wrote Judge Betty Fletcher for the appeals court panel.

Rosenthal was convicted of growing large quantities of marijuana ("ganja") and distributing it to Bay Area medicinal marijuana clubs. Though prosecutors had sought a 6 1/2 year term, Rosenthal was sentenced to serve only one day in jail. The judge in the case handed down the short sentence because Rosenthal believed the growth of marijuana for medicinal purposes was legal under California state law.

In January 2004, California enacted a state law allowing patients to use marijuana for medical reasons with a doctor's prescription. However, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005, that federal law trumps state statutes and can be used to prevent doctors from prescribing marijuana. The conflict between federal and state law on medical marijuana continues to this day in California.

Also See: CA Cities Scramble to Regulate or Ban Medical Marijuana

Comments

April 27, 2006 at 7:11 pm
(1) Allan says:

Thanks for this one too Robert.

So lets see… its not medicine, but they’ve approved it in a not-smoked form for phase III trials by a Pharmcorp. The feds are the nation’s sole provider of medical cannabis (grown at the U of Miss) to a small and shrinking group of patients. Yet an affirmative medical use defense isn’t allowable under federal regs… and so believing in that one are we that as a nation we barely if at all paused as the federal WOD bureacracy killed Peter McWilliams defending their notion that they get to decide what evidence we get to defend ourselves with. Whew…

This brew will ripen quickly in the summer heat. It will not remain a non-issue. In upcoming presidential elections the charade will fade. This is a really big lie. Like the biggest they’ve ever told.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore US Government Info

About.com Special Features

What is a Recession?

Sure, we're all talking about it, but what, exactly, defines a recession? More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.