Parks Service Appeases Creationists at Grand Canyon
Employees of the Grand Canyon National Park have been directed not to offer an estimate of the geologic age of the canyon, reports the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), who contend the action was directed by Bush administration officials in order to appease creationists.
"In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch in a press release. "It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is 'no comment.'"
The controversy centers on the continued sale of a book at park bookstores -- government operated facilities -- that contends the Grand Canyon was created by Noah's flood. Attempts in 2003 by the Park Superintendent to block the sale of the book Grand Canyon: A Different View by Tom Vail, were blocked by the National Parks Service.
"As one park geologist said, this is equivalent of Yellowstone National Park selling a book entitled Geysers of Old Faithful: Nostrils of Satan," Ruch added.
Photo courtesy of National Parks Service
Also See:
Parks Service Sticks With Biblical Explanation for Grand Canyon
Separation of Church, State and Supreme Court


Comments
The government does not have to censor the age of the Grand Canyon. The place is obviously not 180,000 years old in the first place.
There are a lot of problems with this story. My investigation turned up a lot. Don’t believe everything you read.
http://parkrangerx.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-believe-everything-you-read.html
GRC sells books, not the NPS. GRC is a private, non-profit group. They also sell American Indian books with creation myths. The book in question is in the “inspirational” section. Most of PEER’s claims are wildly unsubstantiated.
MAYBE YOU SHOULD LOOK AT THE GRAND CANYON AS A NATRUAL WORK OF ART AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT TAKES A LONG TIME TO FORM THOSE FORMATION. PLEASE KEEP RELGION IN CHURCH. THANK YOU.
You’ve been scammed. Even Skeptic magazine was scammed on this one.
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-01-17.html
I was scammed! But I won’t be scammed by PEER again. See: http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/a/217496.htm