Anti-Flag Burning Amendment to be Debated in Senate
Dateline: 03/24/00
The United States Senate is scheduled on Monday, March 27 to begin debate on the controversial "anti-flag burning" constitutional amendment.
The proposed amendment would grant Congress the authority to enact laws prohibiting any intentional acts desecrating the flag, but would not, in itself, ban such activities.
What the Senate will be debating is Senate Joint Resolution 14 -- "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States." Senator Orrin Hatch (R - Utah ) is the sponsor or the resolution which has 57 cosponsors in the Senate. The resolution will require a 2/3 majority -- 67 votes -- to pass.
The House passed its version of the same resolution by a roll call vote of 305 - 124 (2/3 majority) on June 24, 1999.
Resolutions calling for amendments to the Constitution require a 2/3 majority vote of both the House and Senate, but do not require the president's signature.
Before any amendment to the Constitution can become effective it must be "ratified" or approved by the legislatures of three-fourths (now 38) of the states. A seven-year time limit is usually allowed for ratification by the states, however, this time can be extended by Congress. The amendment process is spelled out in Article V of the Constitution.
Reference Resources
Senate Debates Flag Burning Amendment
Details on the resolution calling for a constitutional amendment to protect the flag. From your About.com Guide.Amending the Constitution
The processes of proposing and adopting constitutional amendments. From your About.com Guide.Senate Joint Resolution 14
Complete text of the resolution calling for a constitutional amendment granting Congress the authority to enact laws prohibiting any intentional acts desecrating the flag.Discussion Group on This Amendment
"I find it pretty amazing that our government is spending so much energy on something that (a) really doesn't matter and (b) is a bad idea anyway." Posted by PEEGE2 on 6/24/99
(This discussion was started when the House considered and approved a resolution calling for the amendment.)
 From other About.com Guide Sites |
ACLU Interview: Flag Burning
The ACLU talks about the flag desecration amendment to the Constitution in an exclusive interview with About.com US Politics Guide John Aravosis.Pandering Patriotism
Real patriots suck it up when somebody exercises freedom with a flag and a match. Civil Liberties Guide J.D. Tuccille offers and opinion on the issue.Flag Burning: A Good Sign of Political Protest
Alternative Media Guide Penny Perkins suggests reasons why the proposed constitutional amendment to bar the burning of the flag is bad for America.Flag Burning: What's Really at Play
A look at the political motivations, or surprising lack thereof, behind this week's flag burning debate. From Politics Guide John Aravosis.Flag Burning Q & A
Guide John Aravosis looks at the politics behind the anti-flag burning amendment.A Piece of Cloth
The movement to ban flag burning seems destined to turn idiots into martyrs. From your About.com Guide to Civil Liberties J.D. Tuccille.The Constitution Desecration Amendment
An argument for safeguarding the Constitution over the flag or any other symbol. From Your About.com Crime Guide Bill Bickel.
Election 2000 Resources
Information on candidates, parties, dates, issues and organizations, from your About.com Guide.
US Government Job Openings
Links to vacancy announcements at dozens of agencies and military branches.
Huge Index of Government Web Sites
One of the largest lists of agencies, bureaus and offices on the Web.
How to...
...do lots of things involving the U.S. Government. Like, get copies of your old tax returns, or get some money to start a business.
Latest News and Features
The latest news and features on US Government Info/Resources.
Express Your Opinions
Just click on a topic to read or take part in the discussion.
