1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info
Record Campaign Finance Fine Assessed
Part 1: Indonesian citizen to pay $8.6 million in fines
 More of this Feature
• 2: What They Wanted
3: More Violators
4: Even More
 
 Join the Discussion
"Share your opinions on a host of government issues"
Click Here to Take Part

"Debate the Gun Control Issue here."
Click Here to Take Part
 

  Related Resources
• Record Contributions
• Contribution Laws
• Elections & Voting
 
 From Other Guides
• Campaign Reform
• Campaign Financing
Canadian Election Law
• Politics & the Military
 
 Elsewhere on the Web
• Justice Department
• Campaign Spending Reports
Campaign Law Resources
 
 
About.com Poll
Should Congress make campaign reform one of its top priorities?

Yes
No
Undecided


Current Results

According to a Justice Department press release of Jan, 16, 2001, an Indonesian citizen will pay $8.6 million in fines for illegally reimbursing U.S. election campaign donors with foreign corporate funds in violation of federal election law.

The $8.6 million fine to be paid be James Tjahaja Riady represents the largest sanction ever imposed in a campaign finance matter in the history of the United States, according to the Justice Department's Campaign Financing Task Force.

Along with Riady. LippoBank California, a California state-chartered bank affiliated with Lippo Group, will plead guilty to 86 misdemeanor counts charging its agents, Riady and John Huang, with making illegal foreign campaign contributions from 1988 through 1994.

Riady is one of 26 people and two corporations charged by the Campaign Financing Task Force, which was established four years ago by Attorney General Janet Reno to investigate allegations of campaign financing abuses in the 1996 election cycle.

Under the terms of his plea agreement, Riady will waive his statutory right to apply for reentry into the U.S. for a period of two years, except when his presence is requested by the government. He will also perform 400 hours of community service, forfeit to the U.S. Treasury any refunds issued to him from any political campaign committees in the wake of this announcement, and be barred from making, reimbursing or directing any future campaign contributions in U.S. elections.

The Justice Department alleged that between May 1990 and June 1994, Riady and Huang conspired to obstruct the Federal Election Commission by illegally reimbursing political campaign contributions with funds often obtained from foreign individuals and entities which were prohibited sources under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), and in violation of the dollar limitations established by the FECA.

According to the Justice Department, the reimbursements were accomplished through the following mechanisms:

  • During the period of May 1990 through July 1991, contributions made by Huang and various employees of LippoBank from 1988 through 1991 were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account maintained by Huang at a bank in Hong Kong;

     
  • During the period of August 1992 through October 1992, shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton's campaign for the Presidency of the United States, contributions made by Huang were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at LippoBank and then distributed to Huang in cash.

     
  • During the period of August 1992 through September 1993, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with wire transfers from foreign Lippo Group entities.

  • During the period of October 1992 through May 1994, contributions made by a Lippo Group executive were reimbursed by cash in Hong Kong.

  • During the period of January 1993 through February 1994, contributions made by Huang and various Lippo Group and LippoBank employees were reimbursed through a fictitious "bonus" issued to Huang from a foreign Lippo Group entity.|
    (Source: U.S. Department of Justice)

What did Riady, LippoBank and Lippo Group expect in return for all their "help?"

Next page > What they wanted for their money > Page 1, 2, 3, 4 

 

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Name
Email

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info