1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info
Justices Limit Scope of Disabilities Act
Part 1: Ruling prevents state employees from suing under ADA
 More of this Feature
• 2: More on This Decision
 
 Join the Discussion
"We need to contact our representatives and other people of influence -- like President George Bush, whose father was instrumental in putting the ADA on the books -- and urge them to support (and preserve!) the rights guaranteed by the ADA."
AB_DISBLTY

"Is the ADA in danger?"
AB-DISBLTY
 

  Related Resources
Police Can Enter Suspects Home
• New Freedom Initiative
• Job Hunting Help for the Disabled
• Supreme Court Tests the ADA
Disabled Access to Voting
Sources of Govt. Aid
 
 From Other Guides
Court Rejects Garrett
Federal Resources for the Disabled
• Disability Issues News
• ADA Regional Contacts
ADA in non-legalese
Help the Justices Decide
 
 Elsewhere on the Web
• Justice Department - ADA Home Page
Text of ADA
• Supreme Court
Complete Decision (PDF)
 
 

Dateline: 02/21/01

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision issued today, limited the reach of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) by ruling that employees of state governments cannot bring employment-related discrimination suits against their employers under the ADA.

The ADA requires employers to provide reasonable workplace accommodations for disabled persons otherwise qualified for a job.

Former President Bush, who signed the ADA in 1990, filed a court brief in support of the two State of Alabama employees who filed the original suite.

The case decided today by the Supreme Court was University of Alabama v. Garrett, in which the State of Alabama argued that parts of Titles I and II of the ADA violate the rights of the states under the Eleventh Amendment.

Basics of the Garrett Case
Patricia Garrett had been an Alabama state employee working as a supervising nurse at the University of Alabama's medical center in Birmingham since 1977. In 1994, Garrett was diagnosed with breast cancer. She had surgery to remove her lymph nodes and underwent extensive radiation and chemotherapy treatments for the next year. When she attempted to return to work in1995, Garrett was demoted and given significantly lower pay. 

Garrett sued the Board of Trustees at the University of Alabama, claiming damages for discrimination under the (ADA). Her attorney's argued that the university violated Garrett's rights by demoting her after taking approved sick leave.

Attorneys for Alabama argued that the US Congress lacked the constitutional power to enact the ADA, thereby forcing states to pay damages for injuries caused by the state's violation of the Act.

A district court judge agreed with Alabama and threw out the suites of both Garrett and another state employee on grounds that the Eleventh Amendment precludes individuals from suing the government without its approval.

But, in a 2-1 opinion,  the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court, finding that the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to require states to pay damages for violations of federal statutes, like the ADA. (Text of Appeals Court Decision.)

By its ruling today, the Supreme Court reverses the decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court, finding that such suits are barred by the 11th Amendment which, the justices said grants states immunity against being sued in federal courts. 

According to the court, Congress had exceeded its authority in allowing state workers file claims under the ADA.

Next page > More on Today's Decision > Page 1, 2

 

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Name
Email

 

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Government Info